Predatory trading: ethics judgments, legality judgments and investment intentions
نویسندگان
چکیده
Purpose Predatory trading is a stock market technique in which certain participants exploit information about other participants' need to trade. often harms others. Hence, this paper examines the determinants and effects of financial practitioners' lay people's judgments predatory trading. Specifically, it investigates how public availability reliability exploited affect their ethics legality latter influence behavioral intentions regulation support. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted two scenario judgment studies. In first study, were practitioners, second – people. Findings Practitioners judge be ethical. people incorporate but tend discount legal criterion. Lay justify using harm, or profit maximization principles. Practitioners' engage let fund managers invest money depend on judgments, Originality/value This explore It highlights that despite harm involves, practitioners Although law tends lag behind innovation, base hence also interpretation regulation. reveals dark aspect relationship between judgments.
منابع مشابه
On normative judgments and ethics
Recent rapid technological and medical advance has more than ever before brought to the fore a spectrum of problems broadly categorized under the umbrella of 'ethics of human enhancement'. Some of the most contentious issues are typified well by the arguments put forward in a recent article on human cognitive enhancement authored by Garasic and Lavazza. Herein I analyse some of the assumptions ...
متن کاملStudying Ethical Judgments and Behavioral Intentions Using Structural Equations: Evidence from the Multidimensional Ethics Scale*
The linkage between ethical judgment and ethical behavioral intention was investigated. The Multidimensional Ethics Scale (MES) was used to measure ethical judgment ratings of hypothetical behaviors in retail, sales, and automobile repair scenarios. Confirmatory factor analysis on a sample of 300 undergraduate business students showed that a model with three latent variables representing three ...
متن کاملReasoning and intuiting the standards for judgments
What is the extension to which the act of reasoning and the standards of judgments are interrelated? The author, proposing Muslim scholars` views in the field and relying on traditions, ahadith, has concluded that firstly one has to answer the question: does the standard and expediency of Divine judgment lies in the judgment or in its object? The latter is signified, however, with view to so...
متن کاملAttributions of intentions and fairness judgments regarding interracial peer encounters.
To investigate how adolescents interpret ambiguous actions in hypothetical interracial peer encounters, we conducted a study in which 8th- and 11th-grade students (N = 837) evaluated 4 interracial peer encounters in which the intentions of the protagonist were ambiguous. The sample was evenly divided by gender and included both African American and European American adolescents. European Americ...
متن کاملDecoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions.
Intentional harms are typically judged to be morally worse than accidental harms. Distinguishing between intentional harms and accidents depends on the capacity for mental state reasoning (i.e., reasoning about beliefs and intentions), which is supported by a group of brain regions including the right temporo-parietal junction (RTPJ). Prior research has found that interfering with activity in R...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Review of Behavioral Finance
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1940-5979', '1940-5987']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/rbf-09-2021-0184